news | articles | reviews | software | modules | accessories | discussion | faq | mobile | store
VisorCentral.com >> Discussion >> General Chat >> Visor General Chat
Non-Flashable OS Starting to Hurt

Post a New Thread | Post A Reply

  Last Thread   Next Thread
Author
Topic: Non-Flashable OS Starting to Hurt    
Kupe
Member

Registered: Jul 2000
Location:
Posts: 106

After 1 year of Visor Deluxe use, I am starting to feel the pinch of being stuck in Palm OS 3.1 land. For example:

PQAs: Sure there's a way around this - but it is a semi-fix to the problem and will only get worse in the future.

Memplug: I would really like this module, and I am really sold now that they have devised away to execute programs off of the module. Limitation? Palm OS Ver 3.5 or higher req'd.

I'm sure there's other examples out there that haven't reached my alarm level and there will be even more to come. So . . .

I am pleased to see Handspring's $100 upgrade program for the Edge - very savvy business move, and serves (in some fashion) to mitigate the inflexibility of their non-flash OS. I guess the point of my thread is: Why aren't they offering this upgrade path with other models too? After all, us Visor/VDX owners stuck back in 3.1 land might like a similar credit with some of their other models too.

Kupe

Kupe is offline Old Post 06-13-2001 07:54 PM
Click Here to See the Profile for Kupe Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
Vinny
Member

Registered: Mar 2000
Location: NC, Indiana
Posts: 465

One reason might be that they only wish to move Visor Edges. This could be due to poor sales, an approaching introduction of a color Edge, or combination thereof. This could also be to compete with the Palm m500. I really don't think Handspring cares about the OS upgrade. They save money on their handhelds by not using it and this is one of the consequences unfortunately. I wouldn't expect HS to provide any upgrades based primarily on getting people a new OS really, but you can consider the Edge offer to be complementary to that desire.

__________________
-Vincent

Vinny is offline Old Post 06-13-2001 09:08 PM
Click Here to See the Profile for Vinny Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
ashmed
Member

Registered: Mar 2001
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 441

quote:
PQAs: Sure there's a way around this - but it is a semi-fix to the problem and will only get worse in the future.


I used PQA's perfectly with my visor deluxe. The only difference is that in 3.1 they don't clutter your launcher like in 3.5.

__________________
You know it's bad when your Calculus Professor uses the word "Unpossible"

"It's a long way from my thoughts to what I'll say, It's a long, long way from paradise to where I am today." -Switchfoot, Home

ashmed is offline Old Post 06-13-2001 09:39 PM
Click Here to See the Profile for ashmed Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
bkbk
Member

Registered: Jun 2000
Location:
Posts: 594

I think VDX is/was just such a robust product its shelf life has proved very long & durable.
The only reason I'd want 3.5 is b/c OmniSky is doing the free modem thing right now.
But Yada Yada did it back at X-mas -- and the VDX can use their modem. (My fault for not jumping on it when I had the chance.)
But I think ALL the upgrades HS has put out there now are pretty incredible. I can even see ppl. skipping the OmniSky thing and getting the Prism & VisorPhone instead (which is obviously what HS is hoping).

__________________
"Great Spirits Have Always Encountered Violent Opposition From Mediocre Minds." -- Albert Einstein

bkbk is offline Old Post 06-14-2001 12:39 AM
Click Here to See the Profile for bkbk Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
slawyer
Member

Registered: Jul 2000
Location: Albany, New York, USA
Posts: 19

Omnisky and Vdx can work

someone has made Omnisky and Vdx work. The thread follows.

http://discussion.visorcentral.com/...?threadid=15640

slawyer is offline Old Post 06-14-2001 01:15 PM
Click Here to See the Profile for slawyer Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
sowens
Member

Registered: Sep 2000
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 284

quote:

Vinny wrote:
I really don't think Handspring cares about the OS upgrade. They save money on their handhelds by not using it and this is one of the consequences unfortunately.



Great. So HS saves themselves about $10 per unit in manufacturing costs, but forces their customers to spend hundreds to get the OS functionality that they need/want. Now that's looking out for your customers!

The M500 is beginning to look better & better....

__________________
It's gotta be weather balloons. It's always weather balloons. Big, fiery, exploding weather balloons.
-- ComaVN (from Slashdot)

sowens is offline Old Post 06-14-2001 05:22 PM
Click Here to See the Profile for sowens Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
Kupe
Member

Registered: Jul 2000
Location:
Posts: 106

From a business model perspective, Handspring should get straight "A"s.

- Save a few bucks per unit with non-flashable memory
- Use a popular OS with a regular update schedule
- Keep your hardware line fresh, exciting, and increasing in cost
- Use a proprietary expansion capability so customers can extend their investment into your product line

The result is an 18-24 month (max) cycle time in which a user must either:

1. Live with the limitations of the original purchase while the static technology (in this case OS) leaves them behind.
2. Invest in a newer, more expensive model before the previous model physically fails.
3. Look elsewhere for a PDA and lose the investment in peripherals.

Pretty smart in my eyes - just a bit frustrating as I find myself at one of these decision points.

Kupe

Kupe is offline Old Post 06-15-2001 02:26 PM
Click Here to See the Profile for Kupe Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
Toby
Member

Registered: Jul 2000
Location:
Posts: 3034

quote:
Originally posted by Kupe
From a business model perspective, Handspring should get straight "A"s.

- Save a few bucks per unit with non-flashable memory [...]



One thing to keep in mind is that saving a few bucks probably wasn't the only thing on their minds. When the Visors were originally produced there were lots of cellphone manufacturers gobbling up all the flash they could get so it caused PDA manufacturers to get left in a lurch. Handspring, once getting over its initial production problems, saw a significant jump in sales due in part to Palm not being able to keep production up with demand because of this.

Toby is offline Old Post 06-15-2001 04:40 PM
Click Here to See the Profile for Toby Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
dick-richardson
Member

Registered: Oct 2000
Location: Aberdeen, SD
Posts: 2531

quote:
Originally posted by sowens
...but forces their customers to spend hundreds to get the OS functionality that they need/want...

Why? Did your old visor lose functionality with the release of the new equipment? Or is it just a matter of the grass being greener on the other side? But don't let me stop you from getting an m505. I'm just curious how irritated you'll be when OS 5 comes out and you'll need/want features that will be suspiciously lacking. But Palm delivered on it's promise for OS upgrade with the V, didn't they. A nice upgrade to the startup screen and very few cosmetic changes to the built-in apps to make it look like flash RAM has this stunning advantage. But the last time I checked, a Palm V couldn't

  • sync with USB
  • access external memory
  • vibrate
  • or utilize any of the other features they mananged to put in the m505 (if any)


Flash RAM sure is keeping us from the "good stuff," isn't it?

__________________
-Joshua
Abortion: Darwinism at its finest.

dick-richardson is offline Old Post 06-16-2001 04:42 PM
Click Here to See the Profile for dick-richardson Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
kgruscho
Member

Registered: Dec 2000
Location: Bonn, Germany
Posts: 55

good point, dick richardson,


to me, I'm not so bothered at HS for not including flash ram on the VDX. I wish they had, but it made sense at the time.

What bothers me, is that HS needs to start offering their new handhelds with flash. There is very little reason to change OS, unless hardware changes. The problem being that with all of the modules out there, not being able to upgrade or alter the OS like a palm can limits what can be done in a module.

the handheld world was changed radically by handspring. when they entered the field, flash ram was basically useful for bug fixes, and UI alterations. Now it is also important for interfacing with expansion modules. which is handspring strongpoint.

Not implementing flash into their products is going to hurt them unless they shift strategies really soon. Handspring themselves should really be developing handspring labeled modules that support VFS and accept CF, SM, MS, MMC/SD, etc.

oh well, we'll see, won't we..

kg

kgruscho is offline Old Post 06-16-2001 09:39 PM
Click Here to See the Profile for kgruscho Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
dick-richardson
Member

Registered: Oct 2000
Location: Aberdeen, SD
Posts: 2531

quote:
Originally posted by kgruscho
good point, dick richardson,


to me, I'm not so bothered at HS for not including flash ram on the VDX. I wish they had, but it made sense at the time.

What bothers me, is that HS needs to start offering their new handhelds with flash. There is very little reason to change OS, unless hardware changes.


But if the hardware changes, having a flashable OS is pointless anyway.
quote:
The problem being that with all of the modules out there, not being able to upgrade or alter the OS like a palm can limits what can be done in a module.


That is a point I had never considered. Still, the OS changes are going to be hand-in-hand with hardware developments (for the most part), and modules that are developed to utilize that hardware are going to leave something to be desired on a device w/o said hardware.

quote:
the handheld world was changed radically by handspring. when they entered the field, flash ram was basically useful for bug fixes, and UI alterations. Now it is also important for interfacing with expansion modules. which is handspring strongpoint.


Yes. Another thought is HS's apparent willingness to switch OS's. Lack of flash pigeonholes some of their devices into a (subjectively) inferior OS.

quote:
Not implementing flash into their products is going to hurt them unless they shift strategies really soon. Handspring themselves should really be developing handspring labeled modules that support VFS and accept CF, SM, MS, MMC/SD, etc.

oh well, we'll see, won't we..

kg


Yes, we will. Want to take bets?

__________________
-Joshua
Abortion: Darwinism at its finest.

dick-richardson is offline Old Post 06-17-2001 05:22 AM
Click Here to See the Profile for dick-richardson Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
All times are GMT. The time now is 06:48 PM. Post New Thread    Post A Reply
  Last Thread   Next Thread
[ Show a Printable Version | Email This Page to Someone! | Receive updates to this thread ]

Forum Jump:

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.4
Copyright ©2000, 2001, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.