innogear
Member
Registered: Feb 2000
Location:
Posts: 13 |
Your ideas and comments are very good here. There is some standardization with MMC, but it's rather hit or miss still. Not all camera companies, MP3 players, etc..., use the same format today.
We will check with GeoDiscovery to see if we are compatible today, or if we can work towards that goal. Very good idea!
We think MiniJam will make a great storage device, and when you look at the cost of approximately $100 for a MiniJam without any MMC, it is an attractivly priced "MMC Reader/Writer" even if used just for the purpose of storing large Palm files (we have the drag and drop USB software on the PC to transfer files to MiniJam MMC). We are planning on a single purpose/smaller form factor/lower cost product later this year (but consider this: It might not cost much more to get full MP3 playback!) The main thing is that we will do a MMC reader/writer in a smaller form factor...there is not a huge cost savings between MiniJam (with no MMC) and a single purpose MMC Reader/Writer module (requires similar hardware).
The main point here is that we can do a reader/writer, so I would like to hear if there is a real demand for dedicated module and what type of files would users plan on storing
Remember that in addition to 32 megabyte sizes, MMC is available in 2,4,8, and 16 megabyte sizes.
Lastly, a small disclaimer here...the ability to write Palm apps and database files to the MMC on MiniJam is all a software issue...our hardware supports this. Our first priority is to support MP3/Digital Audio files. We will start ship with our without full Palm app file transfer support and provide free upgrades as they become available. We have a high demand to get our MP3 player to the market, so we do not want to delay a product launch due to a feature that end users can get later with a software upgrade.
------------------
Bob Fullerton
InnoGear Inc.
[This message has been edited by innogear (edited 05-10-2000).]
|