Xavier
Member
Registered: Jun 2000
Location: Boston, MA, USA
Posts: 7 |
quote: Originally posted by dick-richardson
Actually, could this be feasible?
According to the public bluetooth specifications:
"Bluetooth can support an asynchronous data channel, up to three simultaneous synchronous voice channels, or a channel which simultaneously supports asynchronous data and synchronous voice. Each voice channel supports a 64 kb/s synchronous (voice) channel in each direction. The asynchronous channel can support max-imal 723.2 kb/s asymmetric (and still up to 57.6 kb/s in the return direction), or 433.9 kb/s symmetric."
So perhaps there's enough bandwidth the tunnel the springboard connection over bluetooth. The main problem, IMO, would be writing the "fake" low-level drivers that interact with the processor pretending to be a springboard. Springboards are, afaik, very low-level when it comes to their interaction with the processor. They interact as a seperate "card" which I believe is hard-wired to the CPU (or some bus directly off it anyway). So, I'm guessing with that in mind: no, it's not possible.
Then again, I'm just a programmer. what do i know about hardware? ;-)
__________________
-XXV
[This space unintentionally left blank]
|