KRamsauer
TreoCentral Staff

Registered: Apr 2002
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 734 |
quote: Originally posted by John Nowak
The answer to your question was in the report you cited.
The proper response is "Oh gee, I missed the bit where my own posted link answers my own question. What a big silly I am." And then everyone would have responded with "Heck, everyone goofs."
You seem incapable of admitting that.
Clearly I am looking for additional information beyond the scope of that article. I'm simply looking for more information. Nothing more. Nothing less. :-) Additionally, my posted link was made after my posted question and when I posted my question I was not aware of that article. I was relying on my brain and auditory reports from around that time. Going back to your application of logic, it was incorrect to assume I knew the latter (the linked article) when making the former(question about anyone reading something such as the link). So to address your comment that I'm incapable of admitting wrong (first of all, that's entirely true as I make mistakes all the time! look at how many posts I've made have been editted ). I submitted a reply to my own question, though didn't answer it, that's true. But my question was a shotgun. It was looking for any and all reports people might have seen/heard. In such a context the link I posted (not known by me when I asked the question) is part of the answer yes, but it doesn't shut the door to other contributions and it certainly doesn't open me up to criticisms that my posts are pointless. I'm sure you understand.
Last edited by KRamsauer on 10-19-2002 at 01:41 AM
|