purpleZ
Guest
Registered: Not Yet
Location:
Posts: N/A |
Re: I took the poll ...
quote: Originally posted by tjd414
And chose #3, because that's me.
As to the piracy issue, I have a few comments.
First, if these corps REALLY wanted to make money, they would offer some choice. When it comes to email, I like SEVEN because it gives me access to my my PC's c:\ drive (ok, 1 folder, but it's big). The SEVEN system works w/o a glitch, BC (Sprint's version) I can't get to work. It seems they have to play with the software when it resides on its device. Give me a choice, and if yours is better I will pay.
Second, in my gut, I believe software should have more flexibility in licensing. Using it on just one device is plain dumb. It should be by owner, not by device. For example, if I wanted to build 2 pc's, one for me and one for my daughter, why should I have to buy 2 copies of the same OS? They are both in my house. Makes no sense to me. And leads to big, fat, greedy, suck up the really good ideas that compete w/us since we have the cash corporations.
Third, you can copy books and cds, movies off the dish and dvds -- what makes software so different? Richard Stallman of MIT fame & developer of GNU (to battle UNIX and perhaps the stepbrother of Linux) has been a proponent of free software since the early 80's. The whole concept behind Linux is that the code is free, you can add to it, but your addition has to be free (code) as well. You can still charge for your product ... but its free to those who want it via the code.
Finally, the price of software is getting out of control. It reminds me of three things. Pharmaceutical companies that charge exhorbitant prices for medicine, then when their patent runs out and they face competition, the price drops like a stone. College professors that write textbooks and require them for their class and their cook is almost always the most expensive. Toll roads all touting that the tolls would be gone once the roads were paid off. Well, some of them are 50+ years old and now its just a convenient way to tax people w/o them really knowing it.
Just my 2�.
1) I don't think it's realistic to expect software makers to invite competition.
2) Regarding multiple device licences: if piracy wasn't rampant, software companies would probably be more willing to do something like this at resonable cost. As things are now, those who pay are - to a degree - subsidizing those who don't.
3) How free are you to copy the things you mentioned? I'm not so sure you're right.
I don't understand the "free" software idea. If your job or company involves selling software, why would you make the effort to produce a good application when the schlockmeister down the street can the just come along and take your code, change it slightly and sell it as his/hers?
4) Pharmaceutical companies are also paying for research, drug trials, marketing, lawsuits, investors, etc. Clone drug companies don't have a lot of those hidden costs.
I have to agree with you about the college books and toll roads though!
Someone suggested this thread is off topic and should be moved. I hope the moderators leave it here, as this is where most of the posting occurs and a lot of the pirated apps seem to have been discussed. Maybe some good will come of this and the piracy issue will finally no longer be ignored.
|