septimus
VisorCentral Staff

Registered: Feb 2001
Location: Them Twin Cities
Posts: 1758 |
quote: Originally posted by BobbyMike
The other justifications have not been "discovered ... false". To the contrary the findings, while not as dramatic as they could be, are pointing towards exactly what was said, that he had ongoing WMD R&D programs in place, that he had prohibited weapons, that he was supporting terrorism, and that he was directly connected to the Al - Quadi "network".
Maybe I haven't been looking hard enough, but everything I've seen has been discredited. The evidence is subpar by any reasonable anaysis. Provide links to difinitive evidence, please. I have yet to see it.
Once again, was this a just war? could be, I'm not sure, but I think that it could be. But if it is just, it is not yet been shown to be just on the basis of either WMD or connections to al queda. It looks to be justified because of the liberation of the Iraqi People---but if that is the only standard, then we ought to be liberating a good portion of the planet.
quote: You're free to say that in your opinion there hasn't been enough information/materials discovered to change your mind, but to assert that the evidence/justification isn't "reasonable" or "false" isn't fact, it's opinion. Some people still assert that the holocaust ( 5 and 1/2 million Jews, 7 million Christians massacred) never happened - does that make it fact? Or opinion?
You're veering off towards hyperbole here.
oh please. This is just ad hominem.
There's no "fact" on Bush's side here either, just "opinion." And his "opinion" is unreasonable in my and most of the world's view. The difference is that when I express my opinion all that happens is the neocons here get their underwear in a bunch, when Bush expresses his opinion he does it with bombs.
Look, the Administration has admitted that this is as much about showing american power as is it about anything else--and it always was.
the only "hyperbole" here is saying that the claim that the WMD evidence is scant is somehow analogous to the claim that the holocaust didn't happen. It's the same hyperbole that drives people to call them freedom fries: a blind refusal to admit that the justifications for the war are morally relative and not morally absolute. I'm okay with that, but not when everybody is pretending that the justifications are absolute. They aren't.
__________________
Don't like somebody? Click "Profile" on a post and then click "Ignore "so and so's" posts". Voila!
|