Chazzz
Member
Registered: Sep 1999
Location: Spokane, WA, USA
Posts: 114 |
The backgrounds on the IIIx and the V are smoother... they're not as grainy as the III's. But aside from a possibly faster refresh rate, did anyone pay attention to the actual PIXEL SPACING?
On the IIIx, you can see space between the pixels pretty easily. On the V, the pixels are packed even tighter together. That, combined with a darker black (the IIIx is a little brownish), makes the V screen better. So, no, HipHop, they're not the same. And maybe I just have good eyes, but I can't believe that other people haven't seen what I believe to be an appreciable difference between the two. Oh yeah, BTW, the pixel spacing makes the screen dimensions SMALLER on the V.
A Handspring rep told me in an email early on that the Visor screen was "better than the IIIx". But from the dimensions I've seen on the net, it looks as if the screen is not the exact same screen as the V. We'll see...
|