VisorCentral.com Pages (4): « 1 [2] 3 4 »
Show 20 posts from this thread on one page

VisorCentral.com (http://discussion.visorcentral.com/vcforum/index.php)
- Communications (http://discussion.visorcentral.com/vcforum/forumdisplay.php?forumid=20)
-- Xircom Cancels Wired Ethernet Module (http://discussion.visorcentral.com/vcforum/showthread.php?threadid=10574)


Posted by [email protected] on 01-23-2001 07:44 AM:

No Ethernet? What's Handspring position on this?

Simply, I want to support PalmOS and all it's efforts but components like Ethernet are critical to my needs. I put down the possibility of going CE because Handspring solved the biggest problem with PalmOS, expandability.

But, although more expensive, WinCE is delivering on sophisticated communications options.

Handspring, where are you in all of this. Xircom isn't the only company that can build these options. What's Handspring's position on this?

Scott R. Myers
Mobile Technology Advocate


Posted by visored on 01-23-2001 04:01 PM:

Thumbs down aaaggh.

It's probably b/c Intel recently bought Xircom. Don't know why it would precipitate this tho. I was REALLY looking forward to being able to telnet, etc. from my Visor. Hopefully someone will release a module to replace Xircoms.


Posted by thisisside5 on 01-24-2001 04:14 AM:

Money talks!

I think yucca has the right idea � If enough of us contact the folks about this, they may eventually wake up and smell the $$$. I sure could use the ability to attach and test a net drop without having to lug a laptop around all day.

Has anyone pointed Xircom to this forum?

__________________
It's electric.


Posted by kram on 01-24-2001 05:10 PM:

Angry


I'm with you guys...

What we need is someone with some "clout" to organize and contact the appropriate individuals (whether it be Handspring or Xircom/Intel or whoever). I'm not sure our small voices will be heard.

James?


Posted by jschaff on 01-24-2001 10:24 PM:

Go to http://www.egroups.com/group/flashadapter-forum and find the Flashadapter forum. This is threads about the Kopsis Engineering product in development. It is a compact flash springboard module that holds compact flash cards for memory expansion.

From the guys who figured it out, there is a single wire change between the CF card and PCMCIA card. It appears to be a simple thing to develop all kinds of PCMCIA adaptations of other cards for the springboard.

__________________
Jeff Schaffer
[email protected]


Posted by jschaff on 01-24-2001 10:30 PM:

Also, for those who have done any research on the 802.11 market, it is completely controlled by Lucent. All products presently out for this market are made by them and marketed by others. The Apple Aircard system is simply two Lucent wireless cards linked together. So THEY are the only one who is holding this technology down till they can maintain their monopoly. This may turn out to be their downfall as bluetooth comes on. It is a public domain product I think, and like Apple, if they do not release their product as public domain, it will be a Mac of Sony Betamax before you know it.

__________________
Jeff Schaffer
[email protected]


Posted by argent on 01-24-2001 10:42 PM:

What does 802.11 have to do with it? We're talking about the *wired* springboard module.

__________________
Rev. Peter da Silva, ULC<br>
<a href=http://www.taronga.com/~peter/>Ar rug t� barr�g ar do mhact�re inniu?</a>


Posted by chomperhead on 01-24-2001 10:58 PM:

Talking

Just so I get my Wireless Ethernet module -- that's the module I've been waiting for. I know this won't be a popular comment on this string, but hey, if killing the wired-Ethernet speeds up production of my wireless-Ethernet, then so be it.

Life w/o wires =)


Posted by argent on 01-24-2001 11:05 PM:

I doubt it will help. If, as is rumored, there are problems with networking that slowed down the wired ethernet link, well, the wireless one will be having the same problems... it's got to do everything that the wired link does plus handle the radio kit.

__________________
Rev. Peter da Silva, ULC<br>
<a href=http://www.taronga.com/~peter/>Ar rug t� barr�g ar do mhact�re inniu?</a>


Posted by yucca on 01-25-2001 06:23 AM:

Re: Money talks!

quote:
Originally posted by thisisside5
Has anyone pointed Xircom to this forum?


Yep. Not that it is likely to matter much. The product manager was very polite, but also very emphatic that the 802.3 SBM is a dead issue. It is a pity really. We already know that Bluetooth degrades 802.11 (but can it possibly be as high as the 20% that some have claimed?!?). Which begs the question: just how many discrete 802.11 nets can you really support in a compact area without everyone's bandwidth getting shot to hell? Also consider that the better wireless phones/headsets are sharing the same frequency band. I know that 802.11 is supposed to be designed to deal with all of this, but I don't know . . .


Posted by argent on 01-25-2001 01:04 PM:

You actually got to speak to someone?

I'm impressed.

And the really annoying thing is... there really isn't an alternative to Xircom or Intel for ethernet (for laptops and NICs respectively), not since 3COM's NICs started sucking so badly, so I can't even boycott them.

__________________
Rev. Peter da Silva, ULC<br>
<a href=http://www.taronga.com/~peter/>Ar rug t� barr�g ar do mhact�re inniu?</a>


Posted by yucca on 01-26-2001 12:46 AM:

Lightbulb re: NIC vendors

If we're not talking servers, I've had success with NetGear. Is there some feature(s) on the Intel NICs that make them a must buy for you?


Posted by Matthew Nichols on 01-26-2001 02:27 AM:

For home use I'm Linksys all the way, been happy with their laptop card too.

__________________
Matt Nichols
[email protected]


Posted by argent on 01-26-2001 03:10 AM:

There are two chipsets that have remained reasonably stable over the past few years, the DEC Tulip and the Intel Etherexpress. Other chipsets have suffered badly from Windows disease... the vendors make changes in the cards and change the driver to match to cover for them, so non-windows systems (UNIX, primarily) has trouble if you don't get exactly the right rev level of the card.

Now Intel has bought and killed the Tulip.

__________________
Rev. Peter da Silva, ULC<br>
<a href=http://www.taronga.com/~peter/>Ar rug t� barr�g ar do mhact�re inniu?</a>


Posted by Toby on 01-26-2001 03:38 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by argent
There are two chipsets that have remained reasonably stable over the past few years, the DEC Tulip and the Intel Etherexpress.


FWIW, the netgear stuff uses the tulip chipset.

quote:
Other chipsets have suffered badly from Windows disease... the vendors make changes in the cards and change the driver to match to cover for them, so non-windows systems (UNIX, primarily) has trouble if you don't get exactly the right rev level of the card.

Now Intel has bought and killed the Tulip.



Do you mean within the Springboard space? Since Compaq bought DEC, wouldn't they control the chipset (or did Xircom buy that part at some other time of which I'm not aware)?


Posted by argent on 01-26-2001 03:52 PM:

OK, if Netgear uses the Tulip chipset then they're Tulip cards. That's cool, but it means Netgear is going to have to come up with a new chipset pretty soon...

Before Compaq bought DEC, DEC spun off a bunch of business including the Tulip chip set. Intel bought it. It's doomed. Compaq's not even shipping the DE500 any more, they're selling the DE600 which is EtherExpress-based.

Within the Springboard space Xircom has been a big disappointment. Their modem is flakey and the "cellular" interface on it isn't a real modem interface, like the 3COM 3CXM756, it's just a serial port with a custom cable. Now they've killed the wired ethernet card.

In the laptop space Xircom's no-dongle ethernet cards are the only way to go. Except for Intel's, and now they own Xircom. Damnit.

__________________
Rev. Peter da Silva, ULC<br>
<a href=http://www.taronga.com/~peter/>Ar rug t� barr�g ar do mhact�re inniu?</a>


Posted by DBrown on 01-26-2001 04:18 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by argent
...Before Compaq bought DEC, DEC spun off a bunch of business including the Tulip chip set. Intel bought it. It's doomed.

...In the laptop space Xircom's no-dongle ethernet cards are the only way to go. Except for Intel's, and now they own Xircom. Damnit.



Anyone notice a pattern here? Maybe the justice department should have eyes for Intel, too.

Dave

__________________
There is nothing yet made by man that cannot be improved upon.


Posted by Toby on 01-26-2001 06:37 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by argent
OK, if Netgear uses the Tulip chipset then they're Tulip cards. That's cool, but it means Netgear is going to have to come up with a new chipset pretty soon...


That really sucks, since Netgear had some excellent consumer level stuff.

quote:
Before Compaq bought DEC, DEC spun off a bunch of business including the Tulip chip set. Intel bought it. It's doomed. Compaq's not even shipping the DE500 any more, they're selling the DE600 which is EtherExpress-based.



Ahh...thanks for the missing bit of information.

quote:
Within the Springboard space Xircom has been a big disappointment. Their modem is flakey and the "cellular" interface on it isn't a real modem interface, like the 3COM 3CXM756, it's just a serial port with a custom cable. Now they've killed the wired ethernet card.



Yeah, I'm really not having a warm, fuzzy feeling about their 802.11 card ever seeing the light of day, either.

quote:
In the laptop space Xircom's no-dongle ethernet cards are the only way to go. Except for Intel's, and now they own Xircom. Damnit.



*sigh* :/


Posted by Toby on 01-26-2001 06:38 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by DBrown
quote:
Originally posted by argent
...Before Compaq bought DEC, DEC spun off a bunch of business including the Tulip chip set. Intel bought it. It's doomed.

...In the laptop space Xircom's no-dongle ethernet cards are the only way to go. Except for Intel's, and now they own Xircom. Damnit.



Anyone notice a pattern here? Maybe the justice department should have eyes for Intel, too.



They already do and have.

http://techlawjournal.com/agencies/ftc-intc/Default.htm


Posted by erzeszut on 01-26-2001 07:46 PM:

Unhappy

Just sent in my email plea to Xircom. I really, really, really wanted that SBM. As a part-time sysadmin planning to become a full-time sysadmin within the next year, that was one little doohickey that would have made my life a lot easier.

In addition to using it at work, I could have used it at home, with a home network and a shared broadband connection. As I told Xircom in my email, they've missed the boat on this one...I suggested it might be prudent to find a new PR firm to do their market research.

Eric


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:45 AM. Pages (4): « 1 [2] 3 4 »
Show 20 posts from this thread on one page

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.4
Copyright © Jelsoft Enterprises Limited 2000 - 2016.