VisorCentral.com
Show 20 posts from this thread on one page

VisorCentral.com (http://discussion.visorcentral.com/vcforum/index.php)
- Springboard Modules (http://discussion.visorcentral.com/vcforum/forumdisplay.php?forumid=10)
-- How much are you going to pay for if programs can run directly from MemPlug/SM card? (http://discussion.visorcentral.com/vcforum/showthread.php?threadid=14446)


Posted by TheOne on 04-27-2001 03:19 AM:

Question

Ah, I think running programs directly from MemPlug could be a good idea. I would like to put some pressure on PiDevelopers and also $$$ if it is neccessary, to do it.

TheOne


Posted by Matthew Nichols on 04-27-2001 05:50 AM:

Your poll really isn't specific enough though, there are so many types of apps that can take advantage of the MemPlug but not all would be priced the same.

__________________
Matt Nichols
[email protected]


Posted by Nutcase on 04-27-2001 06:50 AM:

I think he means how much would you be willing to pay for a program that would make it possible to run an app directly from the module. Sorta an auto-mover or something. Not how much would you pay for each app.

In otherwords... if you buy a mem-plug, how much extra would you pay to make it act like the standard visor memory, running apps...etc


Posted by TheOne on 04-27-2001 06:51 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by Matthew Nichols
Your poll really isn't specific enough though, there are so many types of apps that can take advantage of the MemPlug but not all would be priced the same.


I mean MemPlug shall have a TRGpro's AutoCF liked program.

TheOne


Posted by mpkirby on 04-27-2001 04:24 PM:

I don't think it's necessary to put any pressure on the PI developers in this regard-- the vibe I've gotten from the "PiDeveloper" user who posts here is that this is exactly the primary focus of their development efforts right now.

-kirb

__________________
All Children Are A Gift From God...

...return unopened for a full refund.


Posted by Matthew Nichols on 04-27-2001 10:30 PM:

Oh, I get it now. I think it should be free in that case. When its available I think it should be bundled with the MemPlug, if they want to raise the price then thats fine, but us early supporters (Many who braved PalmGear, some who've been waiting for like a month) should get it for free.

__________________
Matt Nichols
[email protected]


Posted by Dave Watkins on 04-28-2001 04:08 PM:

If it isn't the MemPlug, then bring on something else to expand the functionality of the Palm OS.

The iPaq (Pocket PC/Win CE) is making major inroads into the marketplace. While the corpoarate world has led the way in use of the handheld computer, education is fast cathing on to the power of the device. The ease with which audio and video can be incorporated into training programs (for example) on the iPaq vis-a-vis the Palm OS gives it a plus. The amount of memory available, out-of-the-box, is another plus for the iPaq. As a original owner of the US Robotics Pilot and a daily user of a Prism, I must admit I see problems ahead for the Palm devices unless ....

__________________
D. Watkins
Please rescue a Greyhound


Posted by Anomaly on 04-28-2001 04:52 PM:

There's such a huge difference in market between a $700+ iPaq and the $200-400 Visor.


Posted by Dave Watkins on 04-28-2001 08:57 PM:

I agree on the expense of the iPaq vs. the Handspring products. But, if I start adding the cost of the modules I use with my Prism, the price differential becomes less in a hurry. Readabilty in "bright" light is another plus for the iPaq. Where I am employed, we have wireless connectivity out-of-doors in common gathering areas. It's next to impossible to use my Prism in such an environment. Not true with the iPaq. Is this another hurdle for the Palm OS to improve?

__________________
D. Watkins
Please rescue a Greyhound


Posted by yardie on 04-29-2001 12:21 AM:

CF in the works

Mr Kessler and the folks at Kopsis Engineering is working on making CF cards read/write as we speak. The pluses of the memPlug are slowly being negated by the Compact Flash solution. There is an update (software) from Kopsis almost every week and there is rumors of a soon-to-be-released Flash CF Card that will use Kopsis's software.

I am excited about what is happening in the memory space...and we all have Mr. Kessler to thank for getting the ball rolling.


Posted by bkbk on 05-02-2001 03:24 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by Dave Watkins
I agree on the expense of the iPaq vs. the Handspring products. But, if I start adding the cost of the modules .... Not true with the iPaq. Is this another hurdle for the Palm OS to improve?



I'll 2nd that thanks to Mr. Kessler, as I've expressed my gratitute to his & his firm's efforts many times on this board by now.

One thing I find pretty ASTOUNDING about the iPaq (yeah, I know they've had their hands full just getting more of them out the door) is that there's still no camera for it -- what, a yr. after its debut? Almost all of the other PDAs have one, but this device that could benefit perhaps most from it, given the screen...
whuzzupwitdat?

__________________
"Great Spirits Have Always Encountered Violent Opposition From Mediocre Minds." -- Albert Einstein


Posted by Matthew Nichols on 05-02-2001 04:58 AM:

Yeah, but there are CF & PCMCIA cameras for people to make do with.

__________________
Matt Nichols
[email protected]


Posted by Visor Guy2 on 05-02-2001 08:30 PM:

None of the CF cameras I have seen work with the iPaq . Even the one that Casio made Just for Pocket PC's I'd really like to be able to take nice Color pics in direct sunlight and be able to see the screen. That'd be sweet.

__________________
<FONT face="verdana,arial,helvetica" size="1" >NetCaptor and Odigo Rule!<i></font>
"The Internet is now on computers?"
Homer Simpson


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:15 AM.
Show 20 posts from this thread on one page

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.4
Copyright © Jelsoft Enterprises Limited 2000 - 2016.